A Series of Cognitive Frameworks for Police RTCC: 01 - OODA



How might cognitive frameworks help people who work inside police "real-time crime centers?" 

To me, it's about putting people, ideas, & pieces of technology together in ways that enhance awareness, sense-making & decision-making. 

The first framework I'll introduce is Boyd's OODA.

OBSERVE: These are the individual sensors, alerts, notifications, camera feeds, & info sources that make their way in front of a human. We are getting better at leveraging technology to automate this process. It's like multiplying our eyes & ears out there in the field. This is NOT situational awareness; it's simply receiving inputs.

ORIENT: This is the contextual understanding of "so what" when a sensor gets triggered or some other information comes in. This is where Intelligence sits, as a form of individual & organizational understanding, sense-making, & pattern discernment. It helps answer "why does this matter?" Without background, new information is relatively useless. (Algorithms are also housed here, helping process raw hashtag#data into patterns, trends, or models.) The layering of geo-spatial & geo-temporal data helps with this orientation by visualizing links via space & time. Dashboards can also help contextualize data or give the data some meaning.  

DECIDE: This is more about hypothesis generation than it is about making decisions. This is where strategy comes in to guide options or alternatives. Strategy informs us what sorts of interventions to take - at both the information/cognitive front (such as where or how to seek more information), as well as the physical/kinetic front. We begin to run mental simulations that will feed back to Observe -- cycling through hashtag#predictions on what interventions or queries to make next. 

ACT: This is where the Decision is put into play. It can be a kinetic/physical act ... or can be a mental act in pursuit of more information, different information, contextual relevance, or meaning. 

And all along, the "Implicit Guidance & Control" pathways are working subconsciously, under the surface, based on internalized mental models, conditioning, & understanding. 

It's a never-ending corkscrewing through time... 

The above is often a delicate balance between speed & accuracy. It's not always a tradeoff, but frequently is.

Between RTCC & Intelligence functions, organizational OODA can be "greased" so that any friction, fog, or sticking points are reduced -- giving us a Win-Win of good info in a timely manner. And when police agencies are operating under well-designed operational strategy, we can further reduce friction in the hypothesis & selection stage. (Recognition-Primed Decision-Making, anyone?) 

I could talk about OODA's applications here all day long!! 

***

What other cognitive frameworks would you like to see applied to RTCC? And I'm going to use the term "framework" quite loosely in this... and include all sorts of models, theories, infographics, and whatnot.

I've got a few others queued up. I've even created a tag for this series! 

***

Lou Hayes, Jr. is a detective supervisor in a suburban Chicago police department. He's focused on multi-jurisdictional crime patterns & intelligence, through organic working groups compromised of investigators & analysts from a variety of agencies. With a passion for training, he studies human performance, decision-making, creativity, emotional intelligence, & adaptability. In 2021, he went back to college (remotely!), in hopes to finally finish his undergrad degree from the University of Illinois - Gies College of Business. Follow Lou on LinkedIn, & also the LinkedIn page for The Illinois Model. ***


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Presentation Hack: Your Last Slide(s)

Image
I've written before about introductory presentation slides . When the audience is filtering into the room, I prefer to play a few minimalist slides on a looping show over the typical static slide jammed with titles, organizations, names, events, and logos. (Many of you have circled back to me after having used this trick to share your successes with it! Thanks for trying it!) But what about ending the presentation? What tricks do I use to bring closure to a projected slide deck? How do I handle a summary or a Question-and-Answer session? First let me contrast two (2) different chronologies of the tail ends of presentations: Weaker Ending Final detail point. Grand closing (climax?) "Are there any questions?" Answer them if they're asked. Thank the audience. Awkwardly leave the platform Stronger Ending Final detail point. Brief Summary "Before I get into the final closing, what questions can I answer?" Answer them if they...
Read the entire post here »

Presentation Hack: "For those of you who don't know me..."

Image
I've been to quite a few weddings. Not that I've been invited to more than any of you, but I have moonlighted in a few banquet halls over the years. As such, I've heard my fair share of toasts by Best Men and Maids of Honor. (And eaten my fair share of dinners in the back half.) For many Best Men or Maids of Honor, the dinner toast is one (1) of the most stressful aspects of a wedding weekend for them. Public speaking causes all sorts of anxiety - magnified by the pressure of knowing your failure might ruin your best friend's most special day of his/her life! Yikes! It doesn't take long to determine who is comfortable holding the microphone. And whether I can see the body language or not, it's sometimes the first few words that come out of their mouths that give it away. Few public speaking phrases get me to cringe as reliably and as intensely as an introduction of  "For those of you who don't know me..." This introduc...
Read the entire post here »

The Generalist versus The Specialist

Image
There exists a conspiracy against the Generalist. Today's culture rewards those who Specialize: doctors, athletes, teachers, cops. Being labeled a Generalist comes with ridicule of being luke-warm, a moderate, uncommitted, or without passion. Those images are false. They are hallucinations. Time and time again, life penalizes the Specialist. We never learn from our mistakes. Striking a balance between being a Generalist or a Specialist hinges on one factor: one's confidence in the future . The equation is quite simple -- the greater the predictability of approaching problems, the more one should become the Specialist; the less foresight one has, the more benefit in being the Generalist. This axiom holds for any aspect of life: financial investment, medicine, emergency preparedness, physical fitness, backcountry camping, education, gambling, and of course....law enforcement operations. As with most of our theories, this is a spectrum bookended by two extremes. With a ...
Read the entire post here »