Weekend Building Blocks - 09 MAR 2018


There's no value in collecting blocks unless you're connecting them to build something awesome!
You haven't seen Weekend Building Blocks in a while for reasons I've stated before: There is a lot of crap out there. Barely worth sharing. However, this was a good week!

  1. Repetitio est mater studiorum - aim to frame the game before playing. Jussi Jaakonaho wrote this piece, integrating: John Boyd, Albert Einstein, Amos Tversky, Dave Snowden, Fred Leland, Daniel Kahneman, Gary Klein, and others. Not going to sugar-coat it: This was a challenging read; not emotionally, but technically/grammatically/structurally. Pound through it. It's got nuggets for us complexity folk who talk in terms of OODA, Cynefin, non-linearity...
  2. Redefining Wrong in Poker, Politics, and Beyond. Annie Duke is a poker player. She talks about how we should adjust the way we look at decision-making. This was a good read, despite a couple of angles I felt needed to be addressed: finite vs infinite games; open-loop vs closed-loop. Tell me if I am being too critical of this...
  3. Why I was drawn to Agile: Impermanence and Boundaries. Stacia Heimgartner opens up to share how Agile/Scrum has changed her life. I connected with this piece because of a similar journey when I started down the path of adaptability (via CrossFit; via Fred Leland; via Henk Iverson; etc). I'm most always a fan of people who are willing to be vulnerable...
  4. What do I mean by Skin in the Game? My Own Version. Nassim Nicholas Taleb wrote a new book on systems and the people inside them. He argues, "Systems learn at the collective level by the mechanism of selection: by eliminating those elements that reduce the fitness of the whole, provided these have skin in the game." People who do not have skin-in-the-game do not deserve the same voice as those who do. As such, he rightly challenges journalists, policy folk, and academics...
  5. Chaos & Order: A Beautiful Narrative. Thomas Keene posted a short excerpt from Stephen R. Donaldson's book Chaos and Order. It touches upon learning, growth, systems, predictability, and tension. Read it. Twice. 

Secondly, I published two (2) blog posts this week:
  • Probing Comlexity. I first learned of Cynefin while I was still assigned to the SWAT team. I found the definitions of complexity and complication valuable. I really connected to his concept of probing, especially as it related to tactical operators entering a building.  
  • Presentation Hack: The Looping Intro Slideshow. I'm a stickler when it comes to slide design in presentations. For as much smack-talking as I do, there is at least one (1) valuable tactic of PowerPoint / Keynote that I most always use in classes, presentations, and workshops. And it's simple to implement! 
Lastly, keep an eye out for my upcoming events. Most of them are police related topics, restricted to sworn officers only. I'm trying to expand....but need help.

I appreciate you allowing me to make these recommendations to you.
    ***

    Lou Hayes, Jr. is a police training unit supervisor in suburban Chicago. He studies human performance & decision-making, creativity, emotional intelligence, and adaptability. Follow him on Twitter at @LouHayesJr or on LinkedIn. 

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    Presentation Hack: Your Last Slide(s)

    Image
    I've written before about introductory presentation slides . When the audience is filtering into the room, I prefer to play a few minimalist slides on a looping show over the typical static slide jammed with titles, organizations, names, events, and logos. (Many of you have circled back to me after having used this trick to share your successes with it! Thanks for trying it!) But what about ending the presentation? What tricks do I use to bring closure to a projected slide deck? How do I handle a summary or a Question-and-Answer session? First let me contrast two (2) different chronologies of the tail ends of presentations: Weaker Ending Final detail point. Grand closing (climax?) "Are there any questions?" Answer them if they're asked. Thank the audience. Awkwardly leave the platform Stronger Ending Final detail point. Brief Summary "Before I get into the final closing, what questions can I answer?" Answer them if they...
    Read the entire post here »

    Presentation Hack: "For those of you who don't know me..."

    Image
    I've been to quite a few weddings. Not that I've been invited to more than any of you, but I have moonlighted in a few banquet halls over the years. As such, I've heard my fair share of toasts by Best Men and Maids of Honor. (And eaten my fair share of dinners in the back half.) For many Best Men or Maids of Honor, the dinner toast is one (1) of the most stressful aspects of a wedding weekend for them. Public speaking causes all sorts of anxiety - magnified by the pressure of knowing your failure might ruin your best friend's most special day of his/her life! Yikes! It doesn't take long to determine who is comfortable holding the microphone. And whether I can see the body language or not, it's sometimes the first few words that come out of their mouths that give it away. Few public speaking phrases get me to cringe as reliably and as intensely as an introduction of  "For those of you who don't know me..." This introduc...
    Read the entire post here »

    The Generalist versus The Specialist

    Image
    There exists a conspiracy against the Generalist. Today's culture rewards those who Specialize: doctors, athletes, teachers, cops. Being labeled a Generalist comes with ridicule of being luke-warm, a moderate, uncommitted, or without passion. Those images are false. They are hallucinations. Time and time again, life penalizes the Specialist. We never learn from our mistakes. Striking a balance between being a Generalist or a Specialist hinges on one factor: one's confidence in the future . The equation is quite simple -- the greater the predictability of approaching problems, the more one should become the Specialist; the less foresight one has, the more benefit in being the Generalist. This axiom holds for any aspect of life: financial investment, medicine, emergency preparedness, physical fitness, backcountry camping, education, gambling, and of course....law enforcement operations. As with most of our theories, this is a spectrum bookended by two extremes. With a ...
    Read the entire post here »